Earlier today, Lou Piniella announced his view that the Cubs should offer Jim Hendry a contract extension due to last season's surprising playoff run. Granted, Hendry did many of the right things this past year, including the acquisitions of Alfonso Soriano, Mark DeRosa, and Ted Lilly, the long-term extensions of Ramirez and Zambrano, and the act of signing Lou Piniella himself. However, we have yet to see Hendry do something that required the use of a brain.

No offense, but didn't Hendry basically save his job by throwing a whole whack of money at the numerous problems his team had? Should he be rewarded for that? There are plenty of GMs out there with incredible management skills who would sacrifice their firstborn to have Hendry's budget for last year, and they'd probably eke out more than 85 wins.

Basically, if you look at it objectively, Hendry has done what exactly to save his job? He renewed the contract of Aramis Ramirez? No-brainer. He went out and signed a talented lefty pitcher and the best hitter on the free agent market last year? No-brainer. He re-upped the best, healthiest pitcher to come through the organization in a generation? No-brainer. He signed a very talented manager who helped turn the ship around? Huge no-brainer - especially when you consider two factors. One, Hendry's second choice for Cubs skipper had won manager of the year and has landed on his feet with the premier organization in all of baseball (therefore suggesting that he may have some talent, and Hendry would had to have been an idiot to have not upgraded on the bench), and two, Hendry's previous choice was a total hack who he left in the clubhouse for four freakin' years, although Cub fans had suffered enough by about May of 2005.

So, we've established that Hendry fixes things with piles of hundred dollar bills and he's not the best judge of managerial character, Lou Piniella not withstanding. How about his eye for young talent?

Well, we've seen a lot of Hendry Players bust at the major league level. Guys like Hee Seop Choi, who had a hole in his swing as big as the neutral zone dividing North and South Korea. Bobby Hill, who will forever be known as an overweight cartoon character. Corey Patterson. Not to mention the legion of Cubs hitting prospects whose names we wish we didn't know because they never even teased us for a solitary major league second - Brian Dopriak, Ryan Harvey, and so many more. I mean, is it that hard to develop a homerun hitting position player? Have the Cubs somehow forgotten how to do it? No offense to Theriot and Fontenot, who are excellent backups, or Ronny Cedeno, who's young enough to keep us suffering for at least three more years, or even to Geo Soto, who just might shock us by being an authentic young talent, but Hendry doesn't seem to hold a clue about how to develop an All Star caliber position player. Maybe Geo Soto will be the exception. Maybe Felix Pie will stand up and produce. Maybe Sam Fuld will forget that he is the average height of a sixth grade boy. But probably not.

In terms of pitching prospects, it's not so bad. Jim's hands guided Hill and Zambrano. He got us - and lost us - Mark Prior. There's some home-grown talent in the pen. Maybe the man knows his pitching, and he should get some props for that. But what about his trading skills?

Hmm. In 2007, Hendry made several moves to ... uh, fortify the Cubs for the playoffs. He acquired Tigers outfielder Craig Monroe for a minor leaguer in order to support the suckiness that was Jacque Jones. (Did we mention that, defying all odds, Hendry once signed Jacque freakin' Jones to a three-year deal?) Monroe went on to celebrate his new-found opportunity to play meaningful baseball by collecting 10 hits in 49 at bats, including 1 homer and 4 RBI. Unsatisfied, Hendry then went on to acquire former Cub Steve Traschel from Baltimore for promising youngsters Rocky Cherry and Scott Moore. Traschel rewarded Hendry's tenacity by surrendering 16 earned runs in 17.1 innings of work.

In fact, looking back on it, the Cubs haven't acquired a single meaningful player in a trade since Nomar Garciaparra came to the North Side, where he promptly slapped a cast onto his ankle and watched his career descend down the toilet.

Maybe I'm crazy, but we're not exactly building the best resume for Hendry right now. It seems to me that his track record is in fact ridiculously bad. The only reason the Cubs have been successful has been because of the piles of money that they apparently keep in a vault below Wrigley Field.

Jim Hendry is not a good general manager. He just happens to be a lucky one, for the moment. He does not deserve a contract extension; in fact, he should be summarily fired the moment Sam Zell ends his obnoxious money grab and hands the team over to a new owner. But, until then, permit me to use some famous last words.

Proving that even the unlikely can happen, the Cubs are built nicely, and they are built to win. Even if Hendry remains in the front office, in spite of his inability to make a good trade or develop a good hitter, what's the worst thing that could happen between now and November?

Well, strap in...

I have a feeling we are gonna get what we always wished for on this one.

It is true, we haven't made a decent long-term trade since we got Ramirez in '03, although getting Kendall was a incremental upgrade over Barrett last year. Thank God Soto came along.

Hendry

You mention how bad Choi and Bobby Hill were but do you see them on the team????

You mention how signing ARam to a long term deal was the right thing to do...Question who got ARam here in 2003? Do you have a short term memory on that?

Who traded Choi for D Lee? Who got rid of a crap Hundley deal to get Karros and Grudzilinek (sp?) to help the 03 team.

You cant help Prior not being here or his injuries. I can go on with more but I have no time.

I think since the cubs have failed since 2003 is all on Hendry but I think it is more on Dusty Baker. In 2004 who trotted out Hawkins in the 9th inn. every game at the end of the season only for him to blow the leads in 90% of them. I think you need to do more research on what you write or at least make full valid points!

Wow

Talk about missing the point!

Sir - I assume you are a sir - Choi and Hill are two of only a handful of examples of the hitters that Jim Hendry has developed in the nearly 10 years that he's been directing our farm system or overseeing our major league team. Hendry's inability to develop a single success story in all that time is unforgivable.

I think that if you were evaluated for your job, and your evaluator determined that you hadn't done a single outstanding thing in over four years, then your boss might have an axe to grind with you. Hendry hasn't made a truly helpful trade since the Republicans last controlled congress. That should tell you something.

Lastly, blaming Dusty Baker but failing to blame the guy who hired - and then refused to fire - him kind of fails to get the point. Pretty much everybody knew that Dusty was crap by early 2005 - if not late 2004, and Hendry refused to let go of a man who seemingly wrecked our organization.

Lastly, sir, the Cubs are one of the premier organizations in baseball. They need to act like it by bringing in a top-notch GM. Hendry is not one of those, and without that cash infusion, he'd be a scout for the Braves right now.

DISCLAIMER: I AM NOT DEFENDING JIM HENDRY

That being said, I think this article is a little critical of Jim, and gives the writers and readers of this site a little too much credit.

You make it sound like we all praised the signings of Ted Lilly, Mark DeRosa, and Lou Pinella. Sure, we all danced in the streets when he signed Soriano, however, the Lilly and DeRosa signings were followed up by posts and comments that spoke of doubts on whether they would produce, or comments of "these are the big signings we have been waiting for". Many times the words "these guys MIGHT be a bargain and produce" were used, but followed up by alot of doubt and Hendry bashing. Give the guy credit, he gambled on them and they panned out, and maybe even helped us more than Soriano did.

And on the Pinella signing, quite a few on this site doubted his decision and wanted Girardi. Some supported the Pinella deal, but this article makes it sound like we unanimously supported the deal.

My point (longwinded though it may be) is give the guy credit for these three moves, and don't downplay them as being no-brainers.

Just my $0.02...........

I was certainly skeptical

I was certainly skeptical about DeRosa, but I think my biggest beef with Lilly was that he overpaid a little.

I'll admit you're right, though, Hendry signed a couple of guys we weren't clamoring for and it paid off. However, I still think that doesn't detract from the fact that his answer to the team's problems was to throw a pile of money at the free agent market. Did some of it stick? Absolutely. But the Cubs shouldn't have been in that position ... a good GM with a franchise as financially strong as this one should have a stronger system in place.

The Farm System

If you really look at which teams do develop young talent?
The ones which are small market
Florida,KC,Tampa,Pittsburg,and any other cash strapped team.
The big market teams use alot of there youg talent in trades.
There plenty of Cubs prospects all around baseball which were traded to try and win now.The pressure of 100 years would never let the Cubs build with youth only. Fans would have a holy cow. Finally we have had managers who dont favor rookies. My whole life the Cubs have been about the veterans with a young guy here or there.

My friends and I called it. If Lou became manager then we would have veterans. If it would have Joe G then we would most likely would of had a youth movement.

Giove Hendry a Break

Come on guys this is the Cubs we are talking about. No one in 100 years has been able to put the Cubs over the top. Is there a more stressful job in sports? Even Lou under estimated the pressure of cubdom. The Tribune is the one who screwed up the Cubs for years. Now we got lame duck owner I am in for the money Sam I am. You could bring Cuban as the owner, Cashman as the GM, and Torre as the coach and you would get the same thing. You dont win right away you must be bad at your job. Lets see what the rest of this season brings [like maybe reaching playoffs two straight years for the first time in forever]. Basically if your company kept having management turn over, your job would be hard to predict as well.

Hendry will make some more trades before this season is over. I would bet he pushes the right buttons. You go Jim.

"You don't win right away

"You don't win right away you must be bad at your job."

Define "right away." Hendry has been Cubs GM since, what, 2002? Before that, he was the director of the farm system since when, the late 90's? How long should we give him to develop some major league offensive talent? How long should we give him to build a winner? Isn't he on his second rebuilding project as we speak?

Generally speaking, I think that Steinbrennerian logic fails baseball. A guy shouldn't be given a one-and-done opportunity to win a championship. That said, five years is plenty of time, and in that time we've seen the Cubs farm system spoil, we've seen the arms of our two best pitchers falter, and we've seen a tremendous amount of turnover of the players and personnel.

Considering that the Cubs are - or should be - one of the finest franchises in baseball, they should be able to spend money on assembling a top-notch farm system program. They haven't. Time to go.

Hendry

Anybody that's read my column on a previous website knows that I have not been a big Hendry fan in recent years. Curiously though I would be inclined to give him a 2 year extension were I Crane Kenney for the following reasons.

First, this is a time of uncertainty with the current ownership situation. Cubs players know what they're getting with Hendry and they seem to be comfortable with him. Here in Nashville I've seen what happens when a team is for sale - the Predators are lucky to even be competing for the playoffs.

Secondly I have to give credit where credit is due. Marquis didn't set the world on fire in the second half but where would we have been in the first half without his wins? Not a division champion, that's for sure. Same with Theriot.

Additionally, I was very unhappy this time last year because of Hendry's trade history (no major acquisitions since Ramirez.) But now we're looking at possible flamethrowers Ascanio and Ceda and Fontenot has proven to be a decent utility player and lefthanded bat off the bench.

Finally I like Hendry's 2008 pre-season moves. He's refused to be robbed in the ongoing Brian Roberts negotiations, Lieber was a good addition (look for him to beat out Marquis)and BIG KUDOS for going after Fukudome! I think Kosuke will be the "missing ingredient" that we needed last year - he's a bonafide #2 hitter and we'll likely see a starting lineup of Roberts, Fukudome, Lee, Soriano, Ramirez, Soto, Theriot and Fuld/Pie.

Let's get Hendry inked because he could end up elsewhere.

First If you come to a fork in the road, take it - Yogi Berra

Baker

At least Hendry didn't allow Baker to go with a 2-man rotation. And he supported Dusty's strict 140 pitch limit (for relievers).

This is a message of Big Brother.

Speaking of doing a bad job

"No offense, but didn't Hendry basically save his job by throwing a whole whack of money at the numerous problems his team had? Should he be rewarded for that? There are plenty of GMs out there with incredible management skills who would sacrifice their firstborn to have Hendry's budget for last year, and they'd probably eek out more than 85 wins."

You should hope no one ever reads this. It might be one of the worst paragraphs in journalistic history. Exactly how much is a whack? Is that a dollar amount, a size, or a weight? And if anyone eeks, give them a piece of cheese. Where I come from, people who barely accomplish something usually eke it out. Do you really want this posted on the Sun-Times website?

missing the point?

If you have issues with us using the term "whack of money," then I don't think you understand what it is that we are doing here.

I'm sure we use a lot of phrases you'd never read in a paper; we always will. That's what makes us ... are you ready for this? ... NOT A PAPER (and in some cases, a hell of a lot better than a paper, too).

Regardless, an official definition for "whack of money" falls in at somewhere above $300 million in a single off season. As far as the typo, thanks for the heads up.

the point you have missed from the beggining of your rant!

I am not the smartest man on earth, but I do remember how the minor leagues bailed out the team last year! or don't you remember that far back? and hendry has made some of the best trades in cubs history with getting rammy and D-lee.

and at the time the trade for kenny loften was great for the team.

and correct me if i am wrong here? but don't you throw a "whack" of money at players you need to fill the holes with?

I dont think they would have signed with the cubs if hendry offered them the league minimum?

I for one think he has helped the Cubs more then he has hurt them.

untill recently I believe the end of the 2006 season he didn't have the money available to him to be able to get the players we needed, and now that he has the money he is spending it.

There's point missing all around

You know, back in the early 1980's, the Cubs had a GM who made a brilliant trade for a young infielder who went on to become a Hall of Famer. He also drafted a talented young pitcher who will go on to become a Hall of Famer. Not to mention he brought in an outfielder converted to infielder who, because of steroids, put up Hall of Fame numbers. For those reasons, I think that Dallas Green should be the Cubs GM to this day.

...not really. Baseball is very much a "what have you done for me lately" game. Jim Hendry absolutely made some brilliant trades ... about four years ago. What has he done in trades lately? Steve Traschel? Jason Kendall? Craig Monroe?

The only thing Hendry has done that makes sense is the spending. The point you have missed is that any idiot with a blank check could logically deduce that it made sense to acquire Soriano, to renew Ramirez's contract, and to ink Zambrano long-term. You don't have to be a brilliant GM to win with a budget like the Cubs, and, as I said in the article you have apparently failed to read correctly even one time, there are incredibly talented GMs out there who would sacrifice first borns to have Hendry's payroll ... and they possibly could have assembled a team that won more than 85 games last year.

Hendry's inability to draft and develop a single star offensive player is a huge detriment. In fact, no offense to Fontenot (who began his career as an Oriole, anyway), Theriot, Pie, and Soto, Hendry has yet to give the Cubs a single offensive star. Pie and Soto may yet develop into something, I hope they do, but they very easily could become Corey Patterson Mrks 2 and 3.

Hendry has also made some really crappy trades in the past few years.

Instead of admiring him for spending a lot of money - anybody can spend a lot of money, nooch - I'd rather consider his overall game. And, guess what? His overall game sucks. I hope that the next Cubs owner brings in somebody who has a stronger approach to the game in its entirety.

Moron.

I totally agree with you. You'd have to be a total moron to think that Jim Hendry should come back to chicago!

eXTReMe Tracker